Does Fiscal Decentralization Impact Environmental Quality in Indonesia?

Authors

  • Indra Sulistyo Universitas Mulawarman
  • Priyagus Priyagus Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda
  • Diana Lestari Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33019/equity.v14i1.701

Keywords:

Fiscal Decentralization, Green Budgeting, Environmental Quality Index (IKLH), Education Level, Resource Curse, Attenuation Effect

Abstract

Purpose: In realizing the need for environmental governance, this study examines the effect of fiscal decentralization on Environmental Quality Index (IKLH) through Green Budgeting as mediation and educational-level moderation as proxy social supervision. Design/Methodology/Approach: Using a balanced panel dataset of 34 Indonesian provinces for the period 2018 to 2024, the study employs Two-Stage Least Squares (TSLS) with Fixed Effects. This approach systematically identifies and accounts for endogeneity bias between fiscal capacity, budgetary allocations, and ecological outcomes. Key Findings: The first-stage estimation indicates that the Flypaper Effect and the Resource Curse are rigid; indeed, none of the central transfers (DAU, DAK, DBH) have an effect on encouraging Green Budgeting. As such, Local Own-Source Revenue (PAD) is established as the driver of ecological innovation. A crucial conditional moderation is highlighted in the second stage: Green Budgeting (GB) alone has no effect on, or improves, IKLH, but when combined with higher education, it acts effectively and, by any means, becomes an important driver of environmental quality. Originality/value: This research challenges the widely held notion that fiscal decentralization improves local environments. It lends empirical support to the argument that, in the absence of rigorous scrutiny from a well-informed citizenry (demand-side social control), government financial interventions (supply-side) will continue to spur inefficiencies. Practical/Policy implications: The reform of revenue-sharing schemes into Ecological Fiscal Transfers (EFT) should be treated as an emergency solution by the central government, whereas local governments must implement transparency in the execution of environmental budget to enforce community social control.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andriani, E., Emo, M., & Baehera, S. (2025). Analisis Komoditas Ekspor, 2020-2024, Sektor Pertanian, Kehutanan, dan Perikanan; Sektor Industri Pengolahan; dan Sektor Pertambangan dan Lainnya. 15, 107. ISSN 2085-6008

Aruga, K. (2022). Environmental and Natural Resource Economics. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95077-4

Bhattacharya, A., Kharas, H., & McArthur, J. W. (2023). Keys To Climate Action How Developing Countries Could Drive Global Success and Local Prosperity. ISBN 9781785363450.

Boadway, R. W. ., & Shah, Anwar. (2009). Fiscal federalism : principles and practices of multiorder governance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511537301

Cheng, Y., Ma, B., & Sun, Y. (2023). Does central ecological transfer payment enhance local environmental performance? Quasi-experimental evidence from China. Ecological Economics, 212, 107920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107920

Dasgupta, P. (2024). The Economics of Biodiversity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009494359

Fitriyani, R., Gusmansyah, & Guevarrato, G. (2022). Buku Panduan Transfer Fiskal Berbasis Ekologi (EFT) TAPE dan TAKE Forum Indonesia untuk Transparansi Anggaran The Asia Foundation. Forum Indonesia untuk Transparansi Anggaran. www.seknasfitra.org. ISBN 978-623-93402-1-6.

Gujarati, D. N. ., & Porter, D. C. . (2010). Basic econometrics. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 9780071276252

Harris, J. M., & Roach, B. (2017). Environmental and Natural Resource Economics (4th Edition). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315620190

Hilmawan, R., Yudaruddin, R., & Sri Wahyuni, Y. (2016). Coal Mining Operations And Its Impact On Sectoral And Regional Area: Evidence Of East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Applied Economics, 6(1), 22–43. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiae.2016.006.01.2

Huang, Y., & Chen, C. (2022). The spatial spillover and threshold effect of green finance on environmental quality: evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(12), 17487–17498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16892-x

Kanazawa, Mark. (2021). Natural resources and the environment economics, law, politics, and institutions Mark Kanazawa. Routledge. ISBN 9780429022654.

Kim, D., & Go, S. (2020). Human Capital and Environmental Sustainability. Sustainability, 12(11), 4736. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114736

Lee, J.-W., & Lee, H. (2016). Human capital in the long run. Journal of Development Economics, 122, 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2016.05.006

Mazzucato, Mariana. (2021). Mission economy : a moonshot guide to changing capitalism. Allen Lane, an imprint of Penguin Books. ISBN 9780241419731.

OECD. (2021). Green Budget Tagging. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/fe7bfcc4-en

OECD. (2024). Green Budgeting in OECD Countries 2024. Organization for Economic Cooperation & Development. ISBN 9789264859593.

Priyagus. (2018). Impact of Foreign Investment and Natural Resources Sharing Funds Against Environmental Degradation in Indonesia. KnE Social Sciences, 3(10), 347. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i10.3140

Raworth, Kate. (2017). Doughnut economics : seven ways to think like a 21st century economist. Chelsea Green Publishing. ISBN 9781603586740.

Solarin, S. A. (2024). Human capital development convergence in OECD countries since 1870: Using school enrolment rates as indicators of human capital development. International Journal of Educational Research, 127, 102389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102389

Tietenberg, T. H. ., & Lewis, Lynne. (2012). Environmental & natural resource economics (9th ed). Pearson Education. ISBN 9780131392571.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-11

How to Cite

Does Fiscal Decentralization Impact Environmental Quality in Indonesia?. (2026). Equity: Jurnal Ekonomi, 14(1), 81-95. https://doi.org/10.33019/equity.v14i1.701